I’ll slash a water spill into a wing and smear the wing into a woman. Symbolizing gestures helps me to recognize interconnection—it blurs the boundaries of individual identity. My father taught me to consider interconnection from a young age.
Painting has helped me understand the way things flow and follow. I know I’m done with a painting when the composition fulfills its origins. I think of depth as circular. The ocean crashes into its own substance. My mind folds into itself. Natural cycles carry depth in folds. I can’t create depth—the world already exists as profound—but I can rediscover it (and remember the awe of my naïveté).
I play with the edges of particularity to consider how abstraction begins and ends. This entails watching how a mark bleeds. Sometimes the pigment diffuses. Other times it drops through drips.
It may stagnate.
(Movement tends to depend on how I prime the surface.) My challenge is discovering how bleeding shapes identity.
Watercolor bleeds. I do too.
What I want out of a creation is often less interesting than what I’ll notice in its divergence from my intent. I see creation as a reconciliation—meditating in the space between what I want and what is. Surrender to a transitioning, developing reality.
I think there’s a fierce beauty in the bleeding of surrender.
I’m experimenting with ‘gestural permanence.’
It’s letting a gesture be as it is. One of the beauties of working with watercolor and ink is that it’s difficult to erase or cover a mark. I think there’s a sort of poetry to this reality—that marks can’t be undone, only built upon. Sometimes, they crescendo towards something greater—a collective creativity.
What is the role of symbolism in today’s world?